Ukraine Premier League

Shakhtar Donetsk Kudrivka

The sharp market makes Shakhtar Donetsk the most likely outcome at 77% — fair odds of 1.30. Dafabet offers 1.15, a market gap of +1.8% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Value flag). Confidence is High and model agreement is Low. Recent form — Shakhtar Donetsk: LWWWL; Kudrivka: DDLWW.

Value opportunity Value flag

1 Shakhtar Donetsk @ 1.15
Bookmaker Dafabet
Price captured
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price vary by country and over time.
Fair price 1.13
Dafabet 1.15
Edge Score15
Confidence: High

Market discrepancy: Shakhtar Donetsk (1) is priced at 1.15 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 1.13 — a +1.8% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single-outcome value bet — separate from our safe prediction below.

Our prediction

1 Home win 77%
Our model (1 / X / 2) 77% / 16% / 7%
Fair odds (pick) 1.30
Market odds (Pinnacle)
Best soft odds (1 / X / 2)
Edge Score 15
Market Gap +1.8%
Confidence High

Confidence reflects the sharp probability and the size of the price gap. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Prediction result Pending

Value lifecycle

Detected ·
1 Shakhtar Donetsk · soft 1.15 (Dafabet) · fair 1.13 · edge +1.8%

“Detected” is when we logged the opportunity before kick-off — not the theoretical first second it appeared. Sharp and soft odds are tracked from our snapshots; when the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Synthetic fair odds lower confidence

Fair odds (pick) 1.15 / 11.13 / 25.20
Bookmakers in consensus5

No sharp benchmark prices this match yet, so these fair odds are synthesized from the consensus of recreational bookmakers, each individually de-margined. This is a weaker anchor than our usual sharp benchmark: we display it for orientation, but we flag no value and record no bets from it.

Match context

The last 2 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 2–0–0 (Shakhtar Donetsk wins – draws – Kudrivka wins).

Shakhtar Donetsk scored 2.2 and conceded 1.2 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Kudrivka scored 1.4 and conceded 1.2 in 5.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Market-relevant trends

Shakhtar Donetsk is averaging 2.2 goals scored over its last 5 matches.
And the market hasn't fully priced it in: value flagged on Shakhtar Donetsk at +1.8% above fair.

We show the trend and whether it is already in the price. Most sites show the streak and let you assume you should bet it.

Why this price?

Shakhtar Donetsk
L W W W L
avg 2.2 scored · 1.2 conceded (last 5)
Kudrivka
D D L W W
avg 1.4 scored · 1.2 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
26 Apr 2026 Kudrivka 1–3 Shakhtar Donetsk
26 Oct 2025 Shakhtar Donetsk 4–0 Kudrivka

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

🔒 Immutable record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1 · Home win
Odds when logged
Closing odds pending
Prediction CLV
Result Pending
Value-bet record
Value selection 1 · Shakhtar Donetsk
Odds when flagged 1.15
Fair odds 1.13
Closing odds pending
Value CLV
Profit (units)
Result Pending
Record hash — integrity fingerprint 32a1de11fa7e0d11

Logged before kick-off. The hash is an integrity fingerprint of the logged values — if any of them changed, the hash would change too. Verify in the public record →

The full record is published daily to an external, append-only public log (Git history + OpenTimestamps), so it is independently verifiable — not even we can rewrite a past record undetectably. Verify on the public log →

External independent verification has been active since 20 June 2026. Earlier records are preserved in our internal ledger but were not externally timestamped before kick-off.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.