Eliteserien

Bodo/Glimt Ham-Kam

The sharp market makes Bodo/Glimt the most likely outcome at 85% — fair odds of 1.18. 1xBet offers 1.20, a market gap of +2.1% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Value flag). Confidence is High and model agreement is Medium. Recent form — Bodo/Glimt: WWDWW; Ham-Kam: LDDWL.

Value opportunity Value flag

1 Bodo/Glimt @ 1.20
Bookmaker 1xBet
Price captured
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price vary by country and over time.
Fair price 1.18
1xBet 1.20
Edge Score17
Confidence: High
Value-bet result Won · 1 +0.20u

Market discrepancy: Bodo/Glimt (1) is priced at 1.20 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 1.18 — a +2.1% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single-outcome value bet — separate from our safe prediction below.

Our prediction

1 Home win 85%
Market probability (1 / X / 2) 85% / 9% / 6%
Our model (1 / X / 2) 79% / 15% / 6%
Fair odds (pick) 1.18
Market odds (Pinnacle) 1.11 / 10.64 / 15.60
Best soft odds (1 / X / 2) 1.20 / 10.40 / 24.00
Edge Score 17
Market Gap +2.1%
Confidence High
Model agreement Medium

Confidence reflects the sharp probability and the size of the price gap. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Prediction result Won · 1

Value lifecycle Settled

Detected ·
1 Bodo/Glimt · soft 1.20 (1xBet) · fair 1.18 · edge +2.1%
Opening sharp
1.11
At close
1.09 · CLV +10.1%
Result
Won +0.20u 🔒 Externally verified

“Detected” is when we logged the opportunity before kick-off — not the theoretical first second it appeared. Sharp and soft odds are tracked from our snapshots; when the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Match context

The last 5 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 3–1–1 (Bodo/Glimt wins – draws – Ham-Kam wins).

Bodo/Glimt scored 2.4 and conceded 0.8 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Ham-Kam scored 1.6 and conceded 2 in 5.

The sharp market price on Bodo/Glimt has barely moved since opening (1.11 to 1.09) — no significant new information has repriced this match.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Market-relevant trends

Bodo/Glimt has won its last 2 matches.
And the market hasn't fully priced it in: value flagged on Bodo/Glimt at +2.1% above fair.

We show the trend and whether it is already in the price. Most sites show the streak and let you assume you should bet it.

Why this price?

Bodo/Glimt
W W D W W
avg 2.4 scored · 0.8 conceded (last 5)
Ham-Kam
L D D W L
avg 1.6 scored · 2 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
03 Aug 2025 Ham-Kam 1–3 Bodo/Glimt
05 Apr 2025 Bodo/Glimt 3–0 Ham-Kam
13 Sep 2024 Bodo/Glimt 3–0 Ham-Kam
20 May 2024 Ham-Kam 1–0 Bodo/Glimt
03 Sep 2023 Ham-Kam 4–4 Bodo/Glimt

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

🔒 Immutable record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1 · Home win
Odds when logged 1.11
Closing odds 1.09
Prediction CLV +1.8%
Result Won
Value-bet record
Value selection 1 · Bodo/Glimt
Odds when flagged 1.20
Fair odds 1.18
Closing odds 1.09
Value CLV +10.1%
Profit (units) +0.20
Result Won
Record hash — integrity fingerprint 8b5dd80962be0d36

Logged before kick-off. The hash is an integrity fingerprint of the logged values — if any of them changed, the hash would change too. Verify in the public record →

The full record is published daily to an external, append-only public log (Git history + OpenTimestamps), so it is independently verifiable — not even we can rewrite a past record undetectably. Verify on the public log →

External independent verification has been active since 20 June 2026. Earlier records are preserved in our internal ledger but were not externally timestamped before kick-off.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.