Primera C

Puerto Nuevo Sacachispas

The sharp market makes Sacachispas the most likely outcome at 42% — fair odds of 2.38. Betfair offers 3.00, a market gap of +3.4% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Strong value). Confidence is Low and model agreement is Medium. Recent form — Puerto Nuevo: WDLWW; Sacachispas: LDWWL.

Value opportunity Strong value

X Draw @ 3.00
Bookmaker Betfair
Price captured
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price vary by country and over time.
Fair price 2.90
Betfair 3.00
Edge Score28
Confidence: Low
Edge at detection +3.4% @ 3.00 ·
Edge right now +3.4% @ 3.00 ·

The gap has held since we flagged it: both the sharp benchmark and the soft price are re-read continuously, and the edge above is computed on the current market, not on the odds we saw at detection.

Value-bet result Lost · X -1.00u

Market discrepancy: Draw (X) is priced at 3.00 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 2.90 — a +3.4% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single-outcome value bet — separate from our safe prediction below.

Our prediction

X/2 Draw or away 77%

When no single result is likely enough, our pick covers the two most probable outcomes (double chance).

Market probability (1 / X / 2) 23% / 34% / 42%
Our model (1 / X / 2) 38% / 29% / 33%
Fair odds (pick) 1.31
Market odds (Pinnacle) 3.63 / 2.58 / 2.16
Best soft odds (1 / X / 2) 3.60 / 3.00 / 2.25
Edge Score 28
Market Gap +3.4%
Confidence Low
Model agreement Medium

Confidence reflects the sharp probability and the size of the price gap. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Prediction result Lost · 1

Value lifecycle Settled

Detected ·
X Draw · soft 3.00 (Betfair) · fair 2.90 · edge +3.4%
Opening sharp
2.58
At close
2.58 · CLV +16.3%
Result
Lost -1.00u 🔒 Externally verified

“Detected” is when we logged the opportunity before kick-off — not the theoretical first second it appeared. Sharp and soft odds are tracked from our snapshots; when the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Match context

The last 2 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 2–0–0 (Puerto Nuevo wins – draws – Sacachispas wins).

Puerto Nuevo scored 0.8 and conceded 0.2 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Sacachispas scored 0.8 and conceded 0.6 in 5.

The sharp market price on Draw has barely moved since opening (2.58 to 2.58) — no significant new information has repriced this match.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Why this price?

Puerto Nuevo
W D L W W
avg 0.8 scored · 0.2 conceded (last 5)
Sacachispas
L D W W L
avg 0.8 scored · 0.6 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
31 Jul 2026 Puerto Nuevo 1–0 Sacachispas
06 Apr 2026 Sacachispas 0–2 Puerto Nuevo

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

🔒 Immutable record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick X/2 · Draw or away
Odds when logged 1.18
Closing odds 1.18
Prediction CLV +0.0%
Result Lost
Value-bet record
Value selection X · Draw
Odds when flagged 3.00
Fair odds 2.90
Closing odds 2.58
Value CLV +16.3%
Profit (units) -1.00
Result Lost
Record hash — integrity fingerprint 8a644b8ecc61b217

Logged before kick-off. The hash is an integrity fingerprint of the logged values — if any of them changed, the hash would change too. Verify in the public record →

The full record is published daily to an external, append-only public log (Git history + OpenTimestamps), so it is independently verifiable — not even we can rewrite a past record undetectably. Verify on the public log →

External independent verification has been active since 20 June 2026. Earlier records are preserved in our internal ledger but were not externally timestamped before kick-off.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.