China League Two

Chengdu Rongcheng II Hubei Chufeng Heli

The sharp market makes Chengdu Rongcheng II the most likely outcome at 45% — fair odds of 2.23. Superbet offers 2.45, a market gap of +9.8% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Strong value). Confidence is Medium and model agreement is Medium. Recent form — Chengdu Rongcheng II: WLDDL; Hubei Chufeng Heli: LDDWD.

Value opportunity Strong value

1 Chengdu Rongcheng II @ 2.45
Bookmaker Superbet
Price captured
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price vary by country and over time.
Fair price 2.23
Superbet 2.45
Edge Score82
Confidence: Medium
Edge at detection +9.8% @ 2.45 ·
Edge right now +9.8% @ 2.45 ·

The gap has held since we flagged it: both the sharp benchmark and the soft price are re-read continuously, and the edge above is computed on the current market, not on the odds we saw at detection.

Value-bet result Won · 1 +1.45u

Market discrepancy: Chengdu Rongcheng II (1) is priced at 2.45 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 2.23 — a +9.8% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single-outcome value bet — separate from our safe prediction below.

Our prediction

1/X Home or draw 75%

When no single result is likely enough, our pick covers the two most probable outcomes (double chance).

Market probability (1 / X / 2) 45% / 30% / 25%
Our model (1 / X / 2) 37% / 28% / 35%
Fair odds (pick) 1.34
Market odds (Pinnacle) 2.06 / 2.96 / 3.46
Best soft odds (1 / X / 2) 2.45 / 3.10 / 3.52
Edge Score 82
Market Gap +9.8%
Confidence Medium
Model agreement Medium

Confidence reflects the sharp probability and the size of the price gap. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Prediction result Won · 1

Value lifecycle Settled

Detected ·
1 Chengdu Rongcheng II · soft 2.45 (Superbet) · fair 2.23 · edge +9.8%
Opening sharp
2.06
At close
2.08 · CLV +17.8%
Result
Won +1.45u 🔒 Externally verified

“Detected” is when we logged the opportunity before kick-off — not the theoretical first second it appeared. Sharp and soft odds are tracked from our snapshots; when the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Match context

The last 1 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 0–0–1 (Chengdu Rongcheng II wins – draws – Hubei Chufeng Heli wins).

Chengdu Rongcheng II scored 1.2 and conceded 1 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Hubei Chufeng Heli scored 1.4 and conceded 1.4 in 5.

The sharp market price on Chengdu Rongcheng II has barely moved since opening (2.06 to 2.08) — no significant new information has repriced this match.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Why this price?

Chengdu Rongcheng II
W L D D L
avg 1.2 scored · 1 conceded (last 5)
Hubei Chufeng Heli
L D D W D
avg 1.4 scored · 1.4 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
22 May 2026 Hubei Chufeng Heli 3–0 Chengdu Rongcheng II

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

🔒 Immutable record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1/X · Home or draw
Odds when logged 1.21
Closing odds 1.22
Prediction CLV -0.8%
Result Won
Value-bet record
Value selection 1 · Chengdu Rongcheng II
Odds when flagged 2.45
Fair odds 2.23
Closing odds 2.08
Value CLV +17.8%
Profit (units) +1.45
Result Won
Record hash — integrity fingerprint 1246789606945f3a

Logged before kick-off. The hash is an integrity fingerprint of the logged values — if any of them changed, the hash would change too. Verify in the public record →

The full record is published daily to an external, append-only public log (Git history + OpenTimestamps), so it is independently verifiable — not even we can rewrite a past record undetectably. Verify on the public log →

External independent verification has been active since 20 June 2026. Earlier records are preserved in our internal ledger but were not externally timestamped before kick-off.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.