Primera Nacional

Gimnasia Jujuy Chaco For Ever

The sharp market makes Gimnasia Jujuy the most likely outcome at 62% — fair odds of 1.62. Unibet offers 1.65, a market gap of +1.9% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Value flag). Confidence is High and model agreement is High. Recent form — Gimnasia Jujuy: LLWDD; Chaco For Ever: WWWDW.

Value opportunity Value flag

1 Gimnasia Jujuy @ 1.65
Bookmaker Unibet
Price captured
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price vary by country and over time.
Fair price 1.62
Unibet 1.65
Edge Score16
Confidence: High
Value-bet result Won · 1 +0.65u

Market discrepancy: Gimnasia Jujuy (1) is priced at 1.65 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 1.62 — a +1.9% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single-outcome value bet — separate from our safe prediction below.

Our prediction

1 Home win 62%
Market probability (1 / X / 2) 62% / 24% / 14%
Our model (1 / X / 2) 61% / 24% / 15%
Fair odds (pick) 1.62
Market odds (Pinnacle) 1.56 / 3.70 / 6.11
Best soft odds (1 / X / 2) 1.65 / 3.70 / 6.00
Edge Score 16
Market Gap +1.9%
Confidence High
Model agreement High

Confidence reflects the sharp probability and the size of the price gap. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Prediction result Won · 1

Value lifecycle Settled

Detected ·
1 Gimnasia Jujuy · soft 1.65 (Unibet) · fair 1.62 · edge +1.9%
Opening sharp
1.56
Result
Won +0.65u 🔒 Externally verified

“Detected” is when we logged the opportunity before kick-off — not the theoretical first second it appeared. Sharp and soft odds are tracked from our snapshots; when the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Match context

The last 1 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 1–0–0 (Gimnasia Jujuy wins – draws – Chaco For Ever wins).

Gimnasia Jujuy scored 1 and conceded 1.4 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Chaco For Ever scored 1.6 and conceded 0.4 in 5.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Market-relevant trends

Gimnasia Jujuy has lost its last 2 matches.
And the market hasn't fully priced it in: value flagged on Gimnasia Jujuy at +1.9% above fair.
Chaco For Ever has won its last 3 matches.
No value Already reflected in the fair price — no value on Chaco For Ever here.

We show the trend and whether it is already in the price. Most sites show the streak and let you assume you should bet it.

Why this price?

Gimnasia Jujuy
L L W D D
avg 1 scored · 1.4 conceded (last 5)
Chaco For Ever
W W W D W
avg 1.6 scored · 0.4 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
28 Mar 2026 Chaco For Ever 1–2 Gimnasia Jujuy

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

🔒 Immutable record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1 · Home win
Odds when logged 1.56
Closing odds pending
Prediction CLV
Result Won
Value-bet record
Value selection 1 · Gimnasia Jujuy
Odds when flagged 1.65
Fair odds 1.62
Closing odds pending
Value CLV
Profit (units) +0.65
Result Won
Record hash — integrity fingerprint d4899e330109af14

Logged before kick-off. The hash is an integrity fingerprint of the logged values — if any of them changed, the hash would change too. Verify in the public record →

The full record is published daily to an external, append-only public log (Git history + OpenTimestamps), so it is independently verifiable — not even we can rewrite a past record undetectably. Verify on the public log →

External independent verification has been active since 20 June 2026. Earlier records are preserved in our internal ledger but were not externally timestamped before kick-off.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.