Uruguay Primera Division

Liverpool Montevideo Albion FC

The sharp market makes Liverpool Montevideo the most likely outcome at 47% — fair odds of 2.14. Unibet offers 3.25, a market gap of +7.5% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Strong value). Confidence is Low and model agreement is Low. Recent form — Liverpool Montevideo: DWLDW; Albion FC: DLDWL.

Value opportunity Strong value

X Draw @ 3.25
Bookmaker Unibet
Price captured
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price vary by country and over time.
Fair price 3.02
Unibet 3.25
Edge Score62
Confidence: Low

Market discrepancy: Draw (X) is priced at 3.25 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 3.02 — a +7.5% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single-outcome value bet — separate from our safe prediction below.

Our prediction

1/X Home or draw 75%

When no single result is likely enough, our pick covers the two most probable outcomes (double chance).

Our model (1 / X / 2) 47% / 28% / 26%
Fair odds (pick) 1.34
Market odds (Pinnacle)
Best soft odds (1 / X / 2)
Edge Score 62
Market Gap +7.5%
Confidence Low

Confidence reflects the sharp probability and the size of the price gap. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Prediction result Pending

Value lifecycle Value still active

Detected ·
X Draw · soft 3.25 (Unibet) · fair 3.02 · edge +7.5%
Opening sharp
2.84
Current Value still active
soft 3.23 · sharp 2.84 · fair 3.02 · edge +6.9%

“Detected” is when we logged the opportunity before kick-off — not the theoretical first second it appeared. Sharp and soft odds are tracked from our snapshots; when the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Synthetic fair odds lower confidence

Fair odds (pick) 2.25 / 3.30 / 3.96
Bookmakers in consensus13

No sharp benchmark prices this match yet, so these fair odds are synthesized from the consensus of recreational bookmakers, each individually de-margined. This is a weaker anchor than our usual sharp benchmark: we display it for orientation, but we flag no value and record no bets from it.

Match context

The last 1 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 1–0–0 (Liverpool Montevideo wins – draws – Albion FC wins).

Liverpool Montevideo scored 0.8 and conceded 0.6 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Albion FC scored 1.2 and conceded 1.4 in 5.

The sharp market price on Draw has barely moved since opening (2.84 to 2.84) — no significant new information has repriced this match.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Why this price?

Liverpool Montevideo
D W L D W
avg 0.8 scored · 0.6 conceded (last 5)
Albion FC
D L D W L
avg 1.2 scored · 1.4 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
06 Feb 2026 Albion FC 1–2 Liverpool Montevideo

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

🔒 Immutable record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1/X · Home or draw
Odds when logged
Closing odds pending
Prediction CLV
Result Pending
Value-bet record
Value selection X · Draw
Odds when flagged 3.25
Fair odds 3.02
Closing odds pending
Value CLV
Profit (units)
Result Pending
Record hash — integrity fingerprint 91dcb2c86881f15c

Logged before kick-off. The hash is an integrity fingerprint of the logged values — if any of them changed, the hash would change too. Verify in the public record →

The full record is published daily to an external, append-only public log (Git history + OpenTimestamps), so it is independently verifiable — not even we can rewrite a past record undetectably. Verify on the public log →

External independent verification has been active since 20 June 2026. Earlier records are preserved in our internal ledger but were not externally timestamped before kick-off.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.