3. Liga

Hansa Rostock Stuttgart II

The sharp market makes Hansa Rostock the most likely outcome at 64% — fair odds of 1.57. Unibet (SE) offers 1.61, a market gap of +2.3% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Value flag). Confidence is High and model agreement is Medium. Recent form — Hansa Rostock: LDWLD; Stuttgart II: LWLLW.

Value opportunity Value flag

1 Hansa Rostock @ 1.61
Bookmaker Unibet (SE)
Price captured
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price vary by country and over time.
Fair price 1.57
Unibet (SE) 1.61
Edge Score19
Confidence: High
Edge at detection +2.3% @ 1.61 ·
Edge right now +2.3% @ 1.61 ·

The gap has held since we flagged it: both the sharp benchmark and the soft price are re-read continuously, and the edge above is computed on the current market, not on the odds we saw at detection.

Value-bet result Won · 1 +0.61u

Market discrepancy: Hansa Rostock (1) is priced at 1.61 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 1.57 — a +2.3% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single-outcome value bet — separate from our safe prediction below.

Our prediction

1 Home win 64%
Market probability (1 / X / 2) 64% / 19% / 18%
Our model (1 / X / 2) 58% / 24% / 18%
Fair odds (pick) 1.57
Market odds (Pinnacle) 1.51 / 4.57 / 4.84
Best soft odds (1 / X / 2) 1.61 / 5.00 / 6.00
Edge Score 19
Market Gap +2.3%
Confidence High
Model agreement Medium

Confidence reflects the sharp probability and the size of the price gap. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Prediction result Won · 1

Value lifecycle Settled

Detected ·
1 Hansa Rostock · soft 1.61 (Unibet (SE)) · fair 1.57 · edge +2.3%
Opening sharp
1.51
At close
1.50 · CLV +7.3%
Result
Won +0.61u 🔒 Externally verified

“Detected” is when we logged the opportunity before kick-off — not the theoretical first second it appeared. Sharp and soft odds are tracked from our snapshots; when the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Match context

The last 4 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 3–1–0 (Hansa Rostock wins – draws – Stuttgart II wins).

Hansa Rostock scored 1.6 and conceded 2.8 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Stuttgart II scored 1.4 and conceded 1.8 in 5.

The sharp market price on Hansa Rostock has barely moved since opening (1.51 to 1.50) — no significant new information has repriced this match.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Why this price?

Hansa Rostock
L D W L D
avg 1.6 scored · 2.8 conceded (last 5)
Stuttgart II
L W L L W
avg 1.4 scored · 1.8 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
09 May 2026 Hansa Rostock 5–3 Stuttgart II
13 Dec 2025 Stuttgart II 0–1 Hansa Rostock
18 Jan 2025 Stuttgart II 0–3 Hansa Rostock
03 Aug 2024 Hansa Rostock 1–1 Stuttgart II

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

🔒 Immutable record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1 · Home win
Odds when logged 1.51
Closing odds 1.50
Prediction CLV +0.7%
Result Won
Value-bet record
Value selection 1 · Hansa Rostock
Odds when flagged 1.61
Fair odds 1.57
Closing odds 1.50
Value CLV +7.3%
Profit (units) +0.61
Result Won
Record hash — integrity fingerprint ffc0fbd59731829a

Logged before kick-off. The hash is an integrity fingerprint of the logged values — if any of them changed, the hash would change too. Verify in the public record →

The full record is published daily to an external, append-only public log (Git history + OpenTimestamps), so it is independently verifiable — not even we can rewrite a past record undetectably. Verify on the public log →

External independent verification has been active since 20 June 2026. Earlier records are preserved in our internal ledger but were not externally timestamped before kick-off.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.