Brazil Serie B

Nautico Recife Goias

The sharp market makes Nautico Recife the most likely outcome at 55% — fair odds of 1.83. Unibet (SE) offers 1.91, a market gap of +4.2% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Strong value). Confidence is High and model agreement is Low. Recent form — Nautico Recife: LDLLW; Goias: LDLDW.

Value opportunity Strong value

1 Nautico Recife @ 1.91
Bookmaker Unibet (SE)
Price captured
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price vary by country and over time.
Fair price 1.83
Unibet (SE) 1.91
Edge Score35
Confidence: High
Value-bet result Lost · 1 -1.00u

Market discrepancy: Nautico Recife (1) is priced at 1.91 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 1.83 — a +4.2% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single-outcome value bet — separate from our safe prediction below.

Our prediction

1/X Home or draw 80%

When no single result is likely enough, our pick covers the two most probable outcomes (double chance).

Market probability (1 / X / 2) 55% / 26% / 20%
Our model (1 / X / 2) 35% / 28% / 38%
Fair odds (pick) 1.24
Market odds (Pinnacle) 1.71 / 3.61 / 4.75
Best soft odds (1 / X / 2) 1.91 / 3.62 / 4.65
Edge Score 35
Market Gap +4.2%
Confidence High
Model agreement Low

Confidence reflects the sharp probability and the size of the price gap. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Prediction result Lost · 2

Value lifecycle Settled

Detected ·
1 Nautico Recife · soft 1.91 (Unibet (SE)) · fair 1.83 · edge +4.2%
Opening sharp
1.71
At close
1.90 · CLV +0.5%
Result
Lost -1.00u 🔒 Externally verified

“Detected” is when we logged the opportunity before kick-off — not the theoretical first second it appeared. Sharp and soft odds are tracked from our snapshots; when the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Match context

Nautico Recife scored 1.2 and conceded 1.8 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Goias scored 0.8 and conceded 1.8 in 5.

Since opening around 1.71, the sharp market price on Nautico Recife has drifted to 1.90 — the market has moved against this outcome.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Why this price?

Nautico Recife
L D L L W
avg 1.2 scored · 1.8 conceded (last 5)
Goias
L D L D W
avg 0.8 scored · 1.8 conceded (last 5)

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

🔒 Immutable record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1/X · Home or draw
Odds when logged 1.16
Closing odds 1.24
Prediction CLV -6.1%
Result Lost
Value-bet record
Value selection 1 · Nautico Recife
Odds when flagged 1.91
Fair odds 1.83
Closing odds 1.90
Value CLV +0.5%
Profit (units) -1.00
Result Lost
Record hash — integrity fingerprint f26c340e27735375

Logged before kick-off. The hash is an integrity fingerprint of the logged values — if any of them changed, the hash would change too. Verify in the public record →

The full record is published daily to an external, append-only public log (Git history + OpenTimestamps), so it is independently verifiable — not even we can rewrite a past record undetectably. Verify on the public log →

External independent verification has been active since 20 June 2026. Earlier records are preserved in our internal ledger but were not externally timestamped before kick-off.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.