Jeonnam Dragons 2–4 Daegu FC
Final score · Half-time 1–3 · Latest results
In the sharp price we recorded for this match, Daegu FC was the most likely outcome at 59% (fair odds 1.71). No value was flagged: no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule. Recent form — Jeonnam Dragons: LWLDD; Daegu FC: WLWDW.
After the whistle
Goals and cards
- 3' 0–1 Matheus Serafim · goal · assist Cesinha · Daegu FC
- 12' 1–1 Kim Beom-Su · goal · assist Jeong Kang-min · Jeonnam Dragons
- 15' Kim Kang-San · yellow card · Daegu FC
- 16' 1–2 M. Dackers · goal · assist Cesinha · Daegu FC
- 37' Lee Rim · yellow card · Daegu FC
- 42' 1–3 Matheus Serafim · goal · Daegu FC
- 69' 2–3 Valdivia (pen.) · Jeonnam Dragons
- 72' Kim Beom-Su · yellow card · Jeonnam Dragons
- 79' 2–4 Cesinha (pen.) · Daegu FC
- 90+1' Han Kook-Young · yellow card · Daegu FC
What the market said before kick-off
- Jeonnam Dragons win 20% did not happen
- Draw 20% did not happen
- Daegu FC win 60% happened
- Over 2.5 goals 63% happened
Pinnacle closing price with the margin removed, next to what happened. It is the market's view, not a tip: an outcome priced at 30% happens about 3 times in 10.
Next matches
Line-ups, events and match stats: API-Football.
The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.
Value check before kick-off
No value was flagged for this match: before kick-off, no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule.
Most likely result
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp, recorded | 21% | 21% | 59% |
Other estimates
| Our model | 33% | 27% | 40% |
|---|
Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.
Match context
Jeonnam Dragons averaged 1.4 goals scored and 2.0 conceded per game over their last 5 matches in our results database; Daegu FC averaged 1.8 and 1.0 over 5.
These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.
Why this price?
Form: most recent match first.
Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.
Public, timestamped record
This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →
Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →
Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.
Methodology
The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.
Measured by TipsAudit
- Most accurate football prediction site? Ranked against the closing line
- Is Statarea accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is ProSoccer.gr accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is FootballPredictions.net accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Independent tipster audit: verified track records
- How to check if a tipster is legit
- Can you verify a Telegram tipster? What we found reading their tips
- Are free football prediction sites accurate? We measure them in public
- Which bookmaker has the lowest margin? Live index
- Free value bet finder for football
- What is closing line value (CLV)?
- Free football predictions dataset with closing odds (CSV)
- Our full track record: every prediction, losses included