Cheongju 2–3 Suwon Bluewings
Final score · Half-time 1–0 · Latest results
In the sharp price we recorded for this match, Suwon Bluewings was the most likely outcome at 61% (fair odds 1.65). No value was flagged: no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule. Recent form — Cheongju: DWDLW; Suwon Bluewings: WDLWW.
After the whistle
What the market said before kick-off
- Cheongju win 17% did not happen
- Draw 22% did not happen
- Suwon Bluewings win 61% happened
Pinnacle closing price with the margin removed, next to what happened. It is the market's view, not a tip: an outcome priced at 30% happens about 3 times in 10.
Next matches
Line-ups, events and match stats: API-Football.
Starting line-ups
Cheongju 4-3-3
- Lee Seung-Hwan GK
- Bak Keon-Woo DF
- Ju-Young Jo FW
- Kim Seon-Min MF
- Jeong Jin-Woo MF
- Seung-Chan Heo MF
- Lee Jong-Eon FW
Suwon Bluewings 4-4-2
- Kim Joon-Hong GK
- Lee Geon-Hee DF
- Ko Jong-Hyun DF
- Han Hyeon-Seo DF
- Lee Jun-Jae DF
- Fessin FW
- Park Hyun-Bin MF
- Jeong Ho-Yeon MF
- Reis MF
- Kang Hyun-Muk MF
Pinnacle, margin removed (home / draw / away): 17 / 22 / 61% when the line-ups came out, 17 / 22 / 61% at kick-off. The price barely moved after the line-ups.
In the big leagues, line-up news is usually already in the price by the time it is official.
The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.
Value check before kick-off
No value was flagged for this match: before kick-off, no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule.
Most likely result
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp, recorded | 18% | 22% | 61% |
Other estimates
| Our model | 28% | 25% | 47% |
|---|
Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.
Match context
Cheongju averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.6 conceded per game over their last 5 matches in our results database; Suwon Bluewings averaged 1.6 and 0.8 over 5.
These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.
Why this price?
Form: most recent match first.
Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.
Public, timestamped record
This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →
Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →
Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.
Methodology
The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.
Measured by TipsAudit
- Most accurate football prediction site? Ranked against the closing line
- Is Statarea accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is ProSoccer.gr accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is FootballPredictions.net accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Independent tipster audit: verified track records
- How to check if a tipster is legit
- Can you verify a Telegram tipster? What we found reading their tips
- Are free football prediction sites accurate? We measure them in public
- Which bookmaker has the lowest margin? Live index
- Free value bet finder for football
- What is closing line value (CLV)?
- Free football predictions dataset with closing odds (CSV)
- Our full track record: every prediction, losses included