Primera Nacional

Chaco For Ever vs Racing Cordoba

No sharp market price is available for this match. Our own model makes Chaco For Ever the most likely outcome at 47%; we make no value call without a sharp benchmark. Recent form — Chaco For Ever: LWDLW; Racing Cordoba: LWDDL.

The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.

Value check

No value

No fresh sharp price right now, so we make no value call.

Most likely result

1/X Home or draw 75%

When no single result is likely enough, our pick covers the two most probable outcomes (double chance).

1X2
Other estimates
Our model47%28%25%

Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.

Fair odds of the pick (as recorded) 1.34
Sharp odds recorded for this prediction (Pinnacle) —
Market Gap —
Confidence —
Prediction result Pending

Team stats: recent matches

Up to the last 10 matches, all competitions; in brackets: Chaco For Ever at home, Racing Cordoba away.

Team statistics, recent matches
Team statistics, recent matchesChaco For EverRacing Cordoba
Goals scored per game 1.20 (1.40) 0.70 (0.40)
Goals conceded per game 0.70 (0.70) 1.20 (1.50)
Over 2.5 goals 50% (40%) 30% (10%)
Both teams scored 40% (40%) 40% (40%)
Clean sheets 60% (60%) 30% (0%)
Failed to score 20% (0%) 40% (60%)

From 10 matches for Chaco For Ever and 10 for Racing Cordoba.

Match context

The last 1 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 0–0–1 (Chaco For Ever wins – draws – Racing Cordoba wins).

Chaco For Ever scored 1.4 and conceded 1.4 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Racing Cordoba scored 0.8 and conceded 1.2 in 5.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Why this price?

Chaco For Ever
L W D L W
avg 1.4 scored · 1.4 conceded (last 5)
Racing Cordoba
L W D D L
avg 0.8 scored · 1.2 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
14 Jun 2026 Racing Cordoba 2–0 Chaco For Ever

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

Public, timestamped record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1/X · Home or draw
Odds recorded for the prediction —
Closing odds pending
Prediction CLV —
Result Pending
Prediction hash — integrity fingerprint ccde15f3ac1eb19d

This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →

Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →

Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.