Latvia 1. Liga

Skanste vs Metta / LU

No sharp market price is available for this match. Our own model makes Metta / LU the most likely outcome at 67%; we make no value call without a sharp benchmark. Recent form — Skanste: LLLLW; Metta / LU: WWWWW.

The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.

Value check · Not checked yet

Value check

Not checked yet

No fresh sharp price right now, so we make no value call.

Most likely result

2 Away win 67% · as recorded
1X2
Other estimates
Our model17%17%67%

Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.

Fair odds of the pick (as recorded) 1.50
Sharp odds recorded for this prediction (Pinnacle) —
Pick result (single or double chance) Pending

Team stats: recent matches

Up to the last 10 matches, all competitions; in brackets: Skanste at home, Metta / LU away.

Team statistics, recent matches
Team statistics, recent matchesSkansteMetta / LU
Goals scored per game 2.60 (2.20) 4.30 (2.80)
Goals conceded per game 2.20 (1.80) 0.70 (0.90)
Over 2.5 goals 70% (70%) 80% (80%)
Both teams scored 80% (40%) 50% (60%)
Clean sheets 0% (20%) 50% (40%)
Failed to score 20% (40%) 0% (0%)

From 10 matches for Skanste and 10 for Metta / LU.

Match context

Skanste averaged 1.6 goals scored and 2.6 conceded per game over their last 5 matches in our results database; Metta / LU averaged 3.8 and 0.4 over 5.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Market-relevant trends

Skanste has lost its last 4 matches.
No value Already reflected in the fair price — no value on Skanste here.
Metta / LU has won its last 5 matches.
No value Already reflected in the fair price — no value on Metta / LU here.

We show the trend and whether it is already in the price. Most sites show the streak and let you assume you should bet it.

Why this price?

Skanste
L L L L W
avg 1.6 scored · 2.6 conceded (last 5)
Metta / LU
W W W W W
avg 3.8 scored · 0.4 conceded (last 5)

Form: most recent match first.

Recent head-to-head
04 Jul 2026 Metta / LU 3–1 Skanste

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

Public, timestamped record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 2 · Away win
Odds recorded for the prediction —
Pinnacle closing odds (with margin) pending
Prediction CLV —
Result Pending
Prediction hash — integrity fingerprint 3bdedca380feeef8

This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →

Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →

Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.