Defensa Y Justicia 1–1 Independiente
Half-time · Live score from API-Football, about a minute behind; the official result is confirmed after the match.
The match has started. Before kick-off the sharp market made Defensa Y Justicia the most likely outcome at 43% (fair odds 2.30). We make no new value calls once a match is under way. Recent form — Defensa Y Justicia: WLWWD; Independiente: LDDLW.
The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.
Value check before kick-off
No value was flagged for this match: before kick-off, no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule.
The market's two most likely results
No single result was 55% likely or more when we logged the match, so this line adds up the two most likely outcomes (double chance).
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp, recorded | 41% | 30% | 29% |
Other estimates
| Our model | 42% | 28% | 30% |
|---|
Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.
Starting line-ups
Defensa Y Justicia 4-2-3-1
- 1 M. Borgogno GK
- 28 V. Loza DF
- 32 Nazareno Roselli DF
- 21 D. Martínez DF
- 30 D. Domínguez DF
- 15 S. Sosa MF
- 8 C. Pérez MF
- 26 J. Lucco MF
- 19 D. Barbona MF
- 24 J. Gutiérrez MF
- 9 L. Fernández FW
Bench: D. Blanco, E. Burdin, A. Hausch, A. Molinas, N. Palavecino, Tiziano Perrota, M. Porcel, A. Portillo, T. Pérez, F. Román, L. Souto, L. Amadé
Coach: J. Vaccari
Regular starters not in the XI
- Damián Fernández — not in the squad (started 5 of the last 5)
Independiente 4-4-2
- 77 S. Mele GK
- 4 S. Arias DF
- 35 J. Arrayago DF
- 36 S. Valdez DF
- 5 N. Banegas DF
- 7 S. Montiel MF
- 16 M. Perez MF
- 8 M. Meza MF
- 24 J. Palais MF
- 6 E. Ávila FW
- 20 Facundo Cruz FW
Bench: F. Calderón, L. Cabral, J. Fedorco, L. Godoy, I. Machuca, D. Martínez, Lautaro Millán, I. Morales, Tomás Parmo, R. Rey, F. Tempone, F. Zabala
Coach: Jádson Viera
Not in the XI does not mean injured: it can be rotation, a suspension or a knock. We only compare with the team's last 5 line-ups.
Match context
Defensa Y Justicia averaged 1.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded per game over their last 5 matches in our results database; Independiente averaged 0.8 and 1.4 over 5.
These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.
Why this price?
Form: most recent match first.
Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.
Proof & methodology
The timestamped record of this prediction, and how the fair price is made.
Public, timestamped record
This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →
Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →
Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.
Methodology
The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.
Measured by TipsAudit
- Most accurate football prediction site? Ranked against the closing line
- 100% sure football predictions? How often favourites really win
- Accumulator tips today, with the real chance it wins
- Is Statarea accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is WinDrawWin accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is ProSoccer.gr accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Independent tipster audit: verified track records
- How to check if a tipster is legit
- Can you verify a Telegram tipster? What we found reading their tips
- Are free football prediction sites accurate? We measure them in public
- Which bookmaker has the lowest margin? Live index
- Free value bet finder for football
- What is closing line value (CLV)?
- Free football predictions dataset with closing odds (CSV)
- Our full track record: every prediction, losses included
