Universidad de Chile vs Cobresal
- Fair price as of — it moves until kick-off
- Line-ups usually from
- Check my slip
The sharp market makes Universidad de Chile the most likely outcome at 76% — fair odds of 1.31. LeoVegas (SE) offers 1.35, a market gap of +3.0% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Strong value). Confidence is High and model agreement is Medium. Recent form — Universidad de Chile: LWWWW; Cobresal: DDDWL.
The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.
Value opportunity Strong value
Confidence reflects only the sharp probability of the selection: high from 50%, medium from 40%, low below. It says how likely the result is, not how big the price gap is. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.
The gap has held since we flagged it: both the sharp benchmark and the soft price are re-read continuously, and the edge above is computed on the current market, not on the odds we saw at detection.
Market discrepancy: Universidad de Chile (1) is priced at 1.35 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 1.31 — a +3.0% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.
A single result where a bookmaker pays above the fair price — separate from the main prediction below.
The market's most likely result
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp now | 76% | 14% | 10% |
Other estimates
| Sharp, recorded | 74% | 15% | 11% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 70% | 19% | 11% |
Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.
Sharp now ·
Prices across 16 bookmakers
| Bookmaker | 1 | X | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fair line | 1.31 | 7.20 | 10.21 |
| Pinnacle sharp | 1.28 | 6.07 | 8.35 |
| 1xBet | 1.26 | 5.40 | 8.70 |
| 888sport | 1.25 | 5.00 | 8.00 |
| Coolbet | 1.28 | 6.00 ★ | 9.50 |
| GTbets | 1.28 | 5.68 | 9.69 ★ |
| Grosvenor UK-only | 1.35 ★ | 5.20 | 7.50 |
| LeoVegas (SE) | 1.35 ★ | 5.20 | 7.50 |
| Unibet (SE) | 1.35 ★ | 5.20 | 7.50 |
Show all 16 bookmakers
| Betfred (UK) UK-only | 1.22 | 5.50 | 8.50 |
| LiveScore Bet UK-only | 1.29 | 4.80 | 7.00 |
| Marathonbet | 1.24 | 5.85 | 9.20 |
| Tipico | 1.22 | 5.80 | 8.00 |
| Unibet (FR) | 1.17 | 4.65 | 7.30 |
| Virgin Bet UK-only | 1.29 | 4.80 | 7.00 |
| Winamax (DE) | 1.22 | 5.40 | 7.50 |
| Winamax (FR) | 1.20 | 5.10 | 7.25 |
Latest price observed in the last 12 hours per bookmaker. Green = above the fair line; ★ = best soft price. Prices move; check the bookmaker before acting. UK-only bookmakers are shown but not yet used for value flags. Choose your bookmakers to see their price on every row
All markets at the fair price
Fair probability from Pinnacle with the margin removed, line by line, next to the best price at other bookmakers. Pinnacle prices as of . We read these markets every 3 hours; the source itself refreshes them every few hours (more often close to kick-off).
Goals: over / under
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 88% fair 1.14 best 1.14 · Betano | 12% fair 8.11 best 6.50 · Bet365 |
| 2.5 | 69% fair 1.44 best 1.44 · Betano | 31% fair 3.27 best 2.92 · Betano |
| 3.5 | 47% fair 2.13 best 2.05 · Betano | 53% fair 1.89 best 1.82 · Betano |
All lines (9)
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 88% fair 1.14 best 1.14 · Betano | 12% fair 8.11 best 6.50 · Bet365 |
| 2.5 | 69% fair 1.44 best 1.44 · Betano | 31% fair 3.27 best 2.92 · Betano |
| 3 | 1.65 fair best 1.62 · Betano | 2.54 fair best 2.35 · Betano |
| 3.25 | 1.89 fair best 1.80 · 1xBet | 2.13 fair best 1.90 · 1xBet |
| 3.5 | 47% fair 2.13 best 2.05 · Betano | 53% fair 1.89 best 1.82 · Betano |
| 3.75 | 2.41 fair best 2.20 · 1xBet | 1.71 fair best 1.57 · 1xBet |
| 4 | 2.90 fair best 2.70 · Betano | 1.53 fair best 1.50 · Betano |
| 4.5 | 28% fair 3.60 best 3.25 · Bet365 | 72% fair 1.38 best 1.35 · Betano |
| 5.5 | 13% fair 7.53 best 6.00 · Bet365 | 87% fair 1.15 best 1.15 · Betano |
Double chance
| 1X | 12 | X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 90% fair 1.11 best 1.07 · William Hill | 86% fair 1.16 best 1.14 · William Hill | 24% fair 4.22 best 3.80 · Betano |
Asian handicap (home team line)
| Line | Universidad de Chile | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| −2.25 | 2.64 fair best 2.40 · 1xBet | 1.61 fair best 1.55 · Bet365 |
| −2 | 2.31 fair best 2.22 · Betano | 1.76 fair best 1.70 · Betano |
| −1.75 | 2.00 fair best 1.90 · Bet365 | 2.00 fair best 1.90 · Bet365 |
| −1.5 | 55% fair 1.81 best 1.75 · Betano | 45% fair 2.24 best 2.12 · Betano |
| −1.25 | 1.61 fair best 1.55 · Bet365 | 2.63 fair best 2.38 · Bet365 |
All lines (9)
| Line | Universidad de Chile | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| −2.75 | 3.70 fair best 3.14 · 1xBet | 1.37 fair best 1.35 · Bet365 |
| −2.5 | 34% fair 2.98 best 2.77 · Betano | 66% fair 1.51 best 1.47 · Betano |
| −2.25 | 2.64 fair best 2.40 · 1xBet | 1.61 fair best 1.55 · Bet365 |
| −2 | 2.31 fair best 2.22 · Betano | 1.76 fair best 1.70 · Betano |
| −1.75 | 2.00 fair best 1.90 · Bet365 | 2.00 fair best 1.90 · Bet365 |
| −1.5 | 55% fair 1.81 best 1.75 · Betano | 45% fair 2.24 best 2.12 · Betano |
| −1.25 | 1.61 fair best 1.55 · Bet365 | 2.63 fair best 2.38 · Bet365 |
| −1 | 1.43 fair best 1.39 · Betano | 3.35 fair best 3.10 · Betano |
| −0.75 | 1.36 fair best 1.30 · Bet365 | 3.79 fair best 3.45 · Bet365 |
Goals by team
Universidad de Chile goals
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 | 51% fair 1.97 best 1.88 · 1xBet | 49% fair 2.03 best 1.89 · Marathonbet |
All lines (3)
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 77% fair 1.30 best 1.29 · Betano | 23% fair 4.29 best 3.50 · Bet365 |
| 2.5 | 51% fair 1.97 best 1.88 · 1xBet | 49% fair 2.03 best 1.89 · Marathonbet |
| 3.5 | 26% fair 3.79 best 3.25 · Bet365 | 74% fair 1.36 best 1.34 · Betano |
Cobresal goals
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 58% fair 1.71 best 1.67 · 1xBet | 42% fair 2.40 best 2.20 · Bet365 |
All lines (2)
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 58% fair 1.71 best 1.67 · 1xBet | 42% fair 2.40 best 2.20 · Bet365 |
| 1.5 | 20% fair 4.94 best 4.33 · Bet365 | 80% fair 1.25 best 1.22 · Marathonbet |
First half
First-half result
| 1 | X | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 60% fair 1.68 best 1.67 · William Hill | 30% fair 3.35 best 2.95 · 1xBet | 11% fair 9.49 best 8.00 · Bet365 |
First-half goals
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 46% fair 2.17 best 2.12 · Betano | 54% fair 1.85 best 1.76 · Marathonbet |
All lines (5)
| Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.40 fair best 1.47 · Betano | 3.47 fair best 2.88 · 1xBet |
| 1.25 | 1.78 fair best 1.66 · 1xBet | 2.28 fair best 2.06 · 1xBet |
| 1.5 | 46% fair 2.17 best 2.12 · Betano | 54% fair 1.85 best 1.76 · Marathonbet |
| 1.75 | 2.68 fair best 2.30 · 1xBet | 1.60 fair best 1.53 · 1xBet |
| 2 | 3.89 fair best 3.02 · 1xBet | 1.35 fair best 1.32 · 1xBet |
These prices come from a feed that refreshes every few hours, so a bookmaker above the fair price here is not a value flag: we only flag value against a sharp price at most 90 minutes old. Double chance comes from the 1X2 fair probabilities. On whole and quarter lines part or all of the stake can be refunded, so we show only the fair price there: the break-even price of that bet, not a win probability. Bookmaker prices more than 12% above the fair price are left out as feed errors.
Most likely scores estimate
- 2–010.2%fair 9.81
- 3–09.2%fair 10.85
- 2–18.9%fair 11.24
- 3–18.1%fair 12.42
- 1–07.8%fair 12.86
- 1–16.3%fair 15.91
Total goals
- 02%
- 110%
- 218%
- 321%
- 4+48%
Estimated from the fair 1X2 and over/under 2.5 prices (Pinnacle, margin removed) with a Poisson model and a low-score correction. Not a bookmaker's correct-score price: the most likely score happens in only about 1 match in 8. How these estimates did →
Team stats: recent matches
Up to the last 10 matches, all competitions; in brackets: Universidad de Chile at home, Cobresal away.
| Team statistics, recent matches | Universidad de Chile | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| Goals scored per game | 2.60 (2.80) | 1.60 (1.10) |
| Goals conceded per game | 1.00 (0.70) | 1.60 (2.40) |
| Over 2.5 goals | 80% (70%) | 50% (70%) |
| Both teams scored | 60% (50%) | 50% (60%) |
| Clean sheets | 30% (50%) | 20% (0%) |
| Failed to score | 10% (0%) | 30% (40%) |
| xG for / against per game | 2.26 / 0.87 | 1.51 / 1.36 |
| Corners for / against per game | 7.10 / 3.50 | 5.50 / 6.70 |
| Cards per game | 1.70 | 2.80 |
Over 2.5 goals: Universidad de Chile in 80% and Cobresal in 50% of their recent matches; the market prices it at 69% for this match.
From 10 matches for Universidad de Chile and 10 for Cobresal. xG, corners and cards: 10 and 10 matches with statistics. Form is public information, so the fair price already includes it: a team's record is context, not a reason to bet.
Match context
Universidad de Chile averaged 3.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded per game over their last 5 matches in our results database; Cobresal averaged 1.4 and 1.8 over 5.
Since opening around 1.32, the sharp market price on Universidad de Chile has shortened to 1.28 — the market has moved towards this outcome.
These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.
Market-relevant trends
We show the trend and whether it is already in the price. Most sites show the streak and let you assume you should bet it.
Why this price?
Form: most recent match first.
Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.
Proof & methodology
The timestamped record of this prediction, and how the fair price is made.
Value lifecycle Value improving
“Detected” is the moment the flag was first shown on the site and written to our ledger (recorded live since 26 September 2026). For earlier matches the flag was reconstructed afterwards from the prices we had stored, and the time shown is when the rule would have fired: a backtest, not a live record. When the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.
Public, timestamped record
Recorded when the site showed it, before kick-off. Its seal is in our public export once this match’s row is published, and in the next daily external snapshot (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter); for flags recorded on match day that snapshot comes after kick-off, so the pre-kick-off proof is our own timestamp.
This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →
Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →
Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.
Methodology
The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.
Measured by TipsAudit
- Most accurate football prediction site? Ranked against the closing line
- 100% sure football predictions? How often favourites really win
- Accumulator tips today, with the real chance it wins
- Is Statarea accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is WinDrawWin accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is ProSoccer.gr accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Independent tipster audit: verified track records
- How to check if a tipster is legit
- Can you verify a Telegram tipster? What we found reading their tips
- Are free football prediction sites accurate? We measure them in public
- Which bookmaker has the lowest margin? Live index
- Free value bet finder for football
- What is closing line value (CLV)?
- Free football predictions dataset with closing odds (CSV)
- Our full track record: every prediction, losses included
