Ludogorets 2–1 Botev Vratsa
Final score · Half-time 2–0 · All of yesterday's results
The sharp market makes Ludogorets the most likely outcome at 77% — fair odds of 1.31. No soft bookmaker is offering more than that fair price right now, so there is no value here — the honest call is to pass. Recent form — Ludogorets: DWLWD; Botev Vratsa: LDWWW.
After the whistle
Match stats
| Match stats | Ludogorets | Botev Vratsa |
|---|---|---|
| Possession % | 52 | 48 |
| Shots | 9 | 7 |
| Shots on target | 3 | 2 |
| Corners | 3 | 2 |
| Yellow cards | 1 | 1 |
| Red cards | 1 | 0 |
What the market said before kick-off
- Ludogorets win 73% happened
- Draw 18% did not happen
- Botev Vratsa win 9% did not happen
Pinnacle closing price with the margin removed, next to what happened. It is the market's view, not a tip: an outcome priced at 30% happens about 3 times in 10.
Next matches
Line-ups, events and match stats: API-Football.
Starting line-ups
Ludogorets 4-2-3-1
- Hendrik Bonmann GK
- Joel Andersson DF
- Edvin Kurtulus DF
- Olivier Verdon DF
- Simeon Shishkov DF
- Aguibou Camara MF
- Ivajlo Chochev MF
- Alberto Salido FW
- Petar Stanić MF
- Bernard Tekpetey MF
- Rwan Cruz FW
Botev Vratsa 4-2-3-1
- Marin Orlinov GK
- Ivan Goranov DF
- Milen Stoev DF
- Lazar Boyanov DF
- Sainey Sanyang DF
- Iliya Yurukov MF
- Antoan Stoyanov MF
- Vladislav Naydenov MF
- Martin Petkov FW
- Kassim Hadji MF
- Daniel Genov MF
Pinnacle, margin removed (home / draw / away): 73 / 18 / 9% when the line-ups came out, 73 / 18 / 9% at kick-off. The price barely moved after the line-ups.
In the big leagues, line-up news is usually already in the price by the time it is official.
The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.
Value check before kick-off
No value was flagged for this match: before kick-off, no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule.
Most likely result
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp, recorded | 77% | 16% | 8% |
Other estimates
| Our model | 58% | 24% | 18% |
|---|
Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.
Match context
The last 4 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 4–0–0 (Ludogorets wins – draws – Botev Vratsa wins).
Ludogorets scored 1 and conceded 0.8 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Botev Vratsa scored 1.6 and conceded 0.8 in 5.
These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.
Why this price?
Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.
Public, timestamped record
This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →
Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →
Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.
Methodology
The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.
Measured by TipsAudit
- Most accurate football prediction site? Ranked against the closing line
- Is Statarea accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is ProSoccer.gr accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is FootballPredictions.net accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Independent tipster audit: verified track records
- How to check if a tipster is legit
- Can you verify a Telegram tipster? What we found reading their tips
- Are free football prediction sites accurate? We measure them in public
- Which bookmaker has the lowest margin? Live index
- Free value bet finder for football
- What is closing line value (CLV)?
- Free football predictions dataset with closing odds (CSV)
- Our full track record: every prediction, losses included