Argentina Liga Profesional

Aldosivi 1–3 Union Santa Fe

Final score · Half-time 1–0 · All of yesterday's results

No sharp market price is available for this match. Our own model makes Union Santa Fe the most likely outcome at 36%; we make no value call without a sharp benchmark. Recent form — Aldosivi: DLLLD; Union Santa Fe: LLWLD.

After the whistle

Match stats

Match statsAldosiviUnion Santa Fe
Possession %4357
Expected goals (xG)0.361.54
Shots1318
Shots on target47
Corners44
Yellow cards31
Red cards01
Fouls69
Offsides30
Goalkeeper saves43
Pass accuracy %7482

What the market said before kick-off

  • Over 2.5 goals 35% happened

Pinnacle closing price with the margin removed, next to what happened. It is the market's view, not a tip: an outcome priced at 30% happens about 3 times in 10.

Referee: Bruno Amiconi, Argentina · Venue: Estadio Jose Maria Minella, Mar del Plata

Next matches

Line-ups, events and match stats: API-Football.

Starting line-ups

Aldosivi 4-4-2

  1. Lucas Acosta GK
  2. Elías López DF
  3. Néstor Breitenbruch DF
  4. Joaquin Pombo DF
  5. Braian Cufré DF
  6. Nicolás Gaitán MF
  7. Lucas Castro MF
  8. Alan Sosa MF
  9. Matías Godoy MF
  10. Andrés Vombergar FW
  11. Andrés Chávez FW

Union Santa Fe 4-4-2

  1. Matías Mansilla GK
  2. Juan Pintado DF
  3. Maizon Rodriguez DF
  4. Juan Pablo Ludueña DF
  5. Lucas Ayala DF
  6. Julián Palacios MF
  7. Lucas Menossi MF
  8. Mauro Luna MF
  9. Emilio Giaccone MF
  10. Cristian Tarragona FW
  11. Marcelo Estigarribia FW

The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.

Value check before kick-off

No value

No value was flagged for this match: before kick-off, no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule.

Most likely result

1/2 Home or away 72%

When no single result is likely enough, our pick covers the two most probable outcomes (double chance).

1X2
Other estimates
Our model36%28%36%

Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.

Fair odds of the pick (as recorded) 1.39
Sharp odds recorded for this prediction (Pinnacle) —
Market Gap —
Confidence —
Prediction result Won · 2

Synthetic fair odds lower confidence

Fair odds of the pick (as recorded) 3.00 / 3.17 / 2.84
Bookmakers in consensus4

No sharp benchmark prices this match yet, so these fair odds are synthesized from the consensus of recreational bookmakers, each individually de-margined. This is a weaker anchor than our usual sharp benchmark: we display it for orientation, but we flag no value and record no bets from it.

Match context

The last 4 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 2–1–1 (Aldosivi wins – draws – Union Santa Fe wins).

Aldosivi scored 0.6 and conceded 1.2 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Union Santa Fe scored 1 and conceded 1.6 in 5.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Market-relevant trends

Aldosivi is winless in its last 5 matches.
No value Already reflected in the fair price — no value on Aldosivi here.
Union Santa Fe has lost its last 2 matches.
No value Already reflected in the fair price — no value on Union Santa Fe here.

We show the trend and whether it is already in the price. Most sites show the streak and let you assume you should bet it.

Why this price?

Aldosivi
D L L L D
avg 0.6 scored · 1.2 conceded (last 5)
Union Santa Fe
L L W L D
avg 1 scored · 1.6 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
23 Feb 2026 Union Santa Fe 1–0 Aldosivi
04 Oct 2025 Union Santa Fe 0–2 Aldosivi
27 Mar 2025 Aldosivi 2–1 Union Santa Fe
28 Aug 2022 Union Santa Fe 0–0 Aldosivi

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

Public, timestamped record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1/2 · Home or away
Odds recorded for the prediction —
Closing odds pending
Prediction CLV —
Result Won
Prediction hash — integrity fingerprint 4542e87da3b98aa0

This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →

Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →

Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.