MLS

Charlotte 0–1 Chicago Fire

Final score · Half-time 0–0 · Latest results

In the sharp price we recorded for this match, Charlotte was the most likely outcome at 44% (fair odds 2.29). No value was flagged: no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule. Recent form — Charlotte: WDWDW; Chicago Fire: LLDDD.

After the whistle

Match stats

Match statsCharlotteChicago Fire
Possession %4159
Expected goals (xG)1.191.11
Shots1118
Shots on target28
Corners46
Yellow cards62
Red cards10
Fouls1415
Offsides30
Goalkeeper saves82
Pass accuracy %8388

What the market said before kick-off

  • Charlotte win 44% did not happen
  • Draw 24% did not happen
  • Chicago Fire win 32% happened

Pinnacle closing price with the margin removed, next to what happened. It is the market's view, not a tip: an outcome priced at 30% happens about 3 times in 10.

Referee: Chris Penso, USA · Venue: Bank of America Stadium, Charlotte

Next matches

Line-ups, events and match stats: API-Football.

Starting line-ups

Charlotte 4-2-3-1

  1. K. Kahlina GK
  2. Will Cleary DF
  3. H. Kessler DF
  4. T. Ream DF
  5. H. Toffolo DF
  6. A. Westwood MF
  7. D. Diani MF
  8. Pep Biel MF
  9. L. de la Torre MF
  10. A. Saint-Maximin MF
  11. A. Goodwin FW

Regular starters not in the XI

  • Liel Abada — not in the starting XI (started 5 of the last 5)
  • David Schnegg — not in the starting XI (started 4 of the last 5)
  • Idan Toklomati — not in the starting XI (started 4 of the last 5)

Chicago Fire 4-3-3

  1. J. Cohen GK
  2. J. Dean DF
  3. J. Elliott DF
  4. M. Mbokazi DF
  5. Leonardo Barroso DF
  6. S. Oregel MF
  7. T. D'Avilla MF
  8. M. Haile-Selassie MF
  9. P. Zinckernagel FW
  10. J. Gómez FW
  11. J. Bamba FW

Regular starters not in the XI

  • C. Brady — not in the starting XI (started 5 of the last 5)
  • R. Lewandowski — not in the starting XI (started 5 of the last 5)
  • A. Gutman — not in the starting XI (started 4 of the last 5)

Not in the XI does not mean injured: it can be rotation, a suspension or a knock. We only compare with the team's last 5 line-ups.

Pinnacle, margin removed (home / draw / away): 44 / 24 / 32% when the line-ups came out, 44 / 24 / 32% at kick-off. The price barely moved after the line-ups.

In the big leagues, line-up news is usually already in the price by the time it is official.

The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.

Value check before kick-off

No value

No value was flagged for this match: before kick-off, no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule.

Two most likely results

1/2 Home or away 77% · as recorded

When no single result is likely enough, our pick covers the two most probable outcomes (double chance).

1X2
Sharp, recorded44%23%33%
Other estimates
Our model47%25%29%

Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.

Fair odds of the pick (as recorded) 1.31
Sharp odds recorded for this prediction (Pinnacle) 2.21 / 4.00 / 2.88
Pick result (single or double chance) Won · 2

Match context

Charlotte averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.0 conceded per game over their last 5 matches in our results database; Chicago Fire averaged 1.6 and 2.4 over 5.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Market-relevant trends

Charlotte is unbeaten in its last 5 matches.
No value Already reflected in the fair price — no value on Charlotte here.
Chicago Fire has lost its last 2 matches.
No value Already reflected in the fair price — no value on Chicago Fire here.

We show the trend and whether it is already in the price. Most sites show the streak and let you assume you should bet it.

Why this price?

Charlotte
W D W D W
avg 1.8 scored · 1 conceded (last 5)
Chicago Fire
L L D D D
avg 1.6 scored · 2.4 conceded (last 5)

Form: most recent match first.

Recent head-to-head
02 Aug 2026 Chicago Fire 2–1 Charlotte
29 Jun 2025 Chicago Fire 3–2 Charlotte
17 May 2025 Charlotte 1–4 Chicago Fire

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

Public, timestamped record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1/2 · Home or away
Odds recorded for the prediction 1.25
Pinnacle closing odds (with margin) 1.27
Prediction CLV -1.6%
Result Won
Prediction hash — integrity fingerprint ca9359ae832c0e40

This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →

Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →

Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.