Lexington 0–0 FC Tulsa
Final score · Half-time 0–0 · Latest results
In the sharp price we recorded for this match, Lexington was the most likely outcome at 57% (fair odds 1.75). No value was flagged: no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule. Recent form — Lexington: WWWWL; FC Tulsa: DWDDL.
After the whistle
Goals and cards
- 90+1' J. Kocevski · yellow card · FC Tulsa
- 90+1' P. Goodrum · yellow card · Lexington
What the market said before kick-off
- Lexington win 59% did not happen
- Draw 24% happened
- FC Tulsa win 17% did not happen
- Over 2.5 goals 52% did not happen
Pinnacle closing price with the margin removed, next to what happened. It is the market's view, not a tip: an outcome priced at 30% happens about 3 times in 10.
Next matches
Line-ups, events and match stats: API-Football.
Starting line-ups
Lexington
- 17 O. Semmle
- 12 X. Zengue
- 5 K. Burks
- 23 J. Brown
- 2 J. Greene
- 16 B. Ferri
- 6 A. Molloy
- 34 M. Fry
- 8 Nick Firmino
- 7 M. Epps
- 9 P. Goodrum
Bench: B. Thompson, G. Addams, M. Muir, P. Seagrist, A. Caborn, M. Tschantret, B. P. Rodrigues, T. Scott, M. Yosef
Coach: Masaki Hemmi
FC Tulsa
- 28 D. Jacomen
- 44 J. Sangwa
- 91 A. Cissoko
- 15 L. Batista
- 23 W. Eisner
- 8 J. Webber
- 6 B. Diallo
- 2 O. Damm
- 66 W. Wilson
- 9 A. Ordonez
- 14 L. Dorsey
Bench: A. Tambakis, D. Pierre, L. Stauffer, R. Cabral, G. Colli, S. Lukic, J. Kocevski
Coach: Luke Spencer
The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.
Value check before kick-off
No value was flagged for this match: before kick-off, no bookmaker price we saw beat the fair price under our rule.
Most likely result
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp, recorded | 57% | 24% | 19% |
Other estimates
| Our model | 34% | 28% | 38% |
|---|
Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.
Match context
Lexington averaged 3.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded per game over their last 5 matches in our results database; FC Tulsa averaged 1.2 and 1.2 over 5.
These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.
Market-relevant trends
We show the trend and whether it is already in the price. Most sites show the streak and let you assume you should bet it.
Why this price?
Form: most recent match first.
Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.
Public, timestamped record
This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →
Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →
Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.
Methodology
The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.
Measured by TipsAudit
- Most accurate football prediction site? Ranked against the closing line
- Is Statarea accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is ProSoccer.gr accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Is FootballPredictions.net accurate? Audited against the closing line
- Independent tipster audit: verified track records
- How to check if a tipster is legit
- Can you verify a Telegram tipster? What we found reading their tips
- Are free football prediction sites accurate? We measure them in public
- Which bookmaker has the lowest margin? Live index
- Free value bet finder for football
- What is closing line value (CLV)?
- Free football predictions dataset with closing odds (CSV)
- Our full track record: every prediction, losses included