China Super League

Henan Jianye 0–1 Tianjin Teda

Final score · Half-time 0–1 · Latest results

When the value flag on Henan Jianye was recorded live, the sharp market made Henan Jianye the most likely outcome at 50% (fair odds 1.99). On Henan Jianye, Unibet (NL) offered 2.07, +3.8% above its fair price of 1.99 (Strong value). Recent form — Henan Jianye: DDDDD; Tianjin Teda: WWWDD.

After the whistle

Goals and cards

  1. 15' Haliq Ablahan · yellow card · Henan Jianye
  2. 27' 0–1 Guilherme Schettine · goal · assist Xadas · Tianjin Teda
  3. 35' Xadas · yellow card · Tianjin Teda
  4. 83' Yin Congyao · yellow card · Henan Jianye
  5. 84' Yan Bingliang · yellow card · Tianjin Teda

Match stats

Match statsHenan JianyeTianjin Teda
Possession %7129
Shots145
Shots on target32
Corners54
Yellow cards22
Red cards00
Fouls810
Offsides20
Goalkeeper saves13
Pass accuracy %8763

What the market said before kick-off

  • Henan Jianye win 49% did not happen
  • Draw 28% did not happen
  • Tianjin Teda win 23% happened
  • Over 2.5 goals 48% did not happen
  • Value flag before kick-off: 1 · Henan Jianye @ 2.07 (Unibet (NL)) Lost

CLV +3.8% vs the fair close. One flag on its own says little; the rule is judged on all of them.

Pinnacle closing price with the margin removed, next to what happened. It is the market's view, not a tip: an outcome priced at 30% happens about 3 times in 10.

Referee: Haixin Li, China · Venue: Zhengzhou Hanghai Stadium, Zhengzhou

Line-ups, events and match stats: API-Football.

Starting line-ups

Henan Jianye 4-2-3-1

  1. 33 Chenglong Shi GK
  2. 4 Yeljan Shinar DF
  3. 23 Lucas Maia DF
  4. 2 Iago Maidana DF
  5. 11 Nebijan Muhmet DF
  6. 6 Shangyuan Wang MF
  7. 15 Abraham Halik MF
  8. 7 Yihao Zhong MF
  9. 10 Bruno Nazário MF
  10. 8 Maranhão MF
  11. 9 Gustavo FW

Bench: Jinshuai Wang, Gouming Wang, Oliver Gerbig, Yixin Liu, Liu Jiahui, Kuo Yang, Dalun Zheng, Osman Ekber, Xulin Fan, Abdurasul Abudulam, Yilin Yang, Congyao Yin

Tianjin Teda 5-4-1

  1. 25 Yan Bingliang GK
  2. 3 Zhenghao Wang DF
  3. 11 Xie Weijun DF
  4. 18 Aitor Córdoba DF
  5. 6 Xianjun Wang DF
  6. 31 Ming-Him Sun DF
  7. 7 Guilherme Schettine MF
  8. 14 Jiahui Huang MF
  9. 10 Cristian Salvador MF
  10. 8 Bruno Xadas MF
  11. 9 Alberto Quiles FW

Bench: Qi Yuxi, Shuai Liu, Shuaiqi Li, Xinghan Wu, Dun Ba, Chen Zhexuan, Li Yongjia, Shi Yan, Qiuming Wang, Hao Guo, Shengpan Ji

Pinnacle, margin removed (home / draw / away): 49 / 27 / 24% when the line-ups came out, 49 / 28 / 23% at kick-off.

In the big leagues, line-up news is usually already in the price by the time it is official.

The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.

Value opportunity before kick-off Strong value

1 Henan Jianye @ 2.07
Bookmaker Unibet (NL)
Price observed
Flag recorded @ 2.07 (Unibet (NL)) · recorded live, before kick-off
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price varied by country and over time.
Fair price 1.99
Unibet (NL) 2.07
Market Gap +3.8%
Confidence High
Model agreement Low

Confidence reflects only the sharp probability of the selection: high from 50%, medium from 40%, low below. It says how likely the result is, not how big the price gap is. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Value flag result Lost · 1 -1.00u

Market discrepancy: before kick-off, Henan Jianye (1) was priced at 2.07 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 1.99 — a +3.8% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single result where a bookmaker pays above the fair price — separate from the main prediction below.

Most likely result

1 Home win 59% · as recorded
1X2
Sharp, recorded59%23%18%
Other estimates
Our model40%29%31%

Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.

Fair odds of the pick (as recorded) 1.68
Sharp odds recorded for this prediction (Pinnacle) 1.62 / 3.89 / 5.02
Pick result (single or double chance) Lost · 2

Value lifecycle Settled

Detected ·
1 Henan Jianye · soft 2.07 (Unibet (NL)) · fair 1.99 · edge +3.8%
Opening sharp
1.62
At close
1.99 · CLV +3.8%
Result
Lost -1.00u 🔒 Recorded live before kick-off

“Detected” is the moment the flag was first shown on the site and written to our ledger (recorded live since 26 September 2026). For earlier matches the flag was reconstructed afterwards from the prices we had stored, and the time shown is when the rule would have fired: a backtest, not a live record. When the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Match context

Henan Jianye averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded per game over their last 5 matches in our results database; Tianjin Teda averaged 1.0 and 0.4 over 5.

Since opening around 1.62, the sharp market price on Henan Jianye has drifted to 1.99 — the market has moved against this outcome.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Market-relevant trends

Henan Jianye is unbeaten in its last 5 matches.
✓ And the market hasn't fully priced it in: value flagged on Henan Jianye at +3.8% above fair.
Tianjin Teda has won its last 3 matches.
No value Already reflected in the fair price — no value on Tianjin Teda here.

We show the trend and whether it is already in the price. Most sites show the streak and let you assume you should bet it.

Why this price?

Henan Jianye
D D D D D
avg 1.6 scored · 1.6 conceded (last 5)
Tianjin Teda
W W W D D
avg 1 scored · 0.4 conceded (last 5)

Form: most recent match first.

Recent head-to-head
19 May 2026 Tianjin Teda 1–2 Henan Jianye

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

Public, timestamped record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1 · Home win
Odds recorded for the prediction 1.62
Pinnacle closing odds (with margin) 2.00
Prediction CLV -19.0%
Result Lost
Value-bet record

Recorded when the site showed it, before kick-off. Its seal is in our public export once this match’s row is published, and in the next daily external snapshot (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter); for flags recorded on match day that snapshot comes after kick-off, so the pre-kick-off proof is our own timestamp.

Value selection 1 · Henan Jianye
Odds when flagged 2.07
Fair odds 1.99
Fair closing odds (Pinnacle, margin removed) 1.99
Value CLV +3.8%
Profit (units) -1.00
Result Lost
Prediction hash — integrity fingerprint eee781f7c19a6155

This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →

Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →

Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.