League Two

Accrington ST 3–1 Gillingham

Final score · Half-time 2–1 · All of yesterday's results

The sharp market makes Accrington ST the most likely outcome at 42% — fair odds of 2.38. Unibet (NL) offers 2.55, a market gap of +7% above the fair price, which is where we flag value (Strong value). Confidence is Medium and model agreement is High. Recent form — Accrington ST: DWDDL; Gillingham: WDLWW.

After the whistle

Goals and cards

  1. 6' Devon matthews · yellow card · Accrington ST
  2. 11' Stefan Mols · goal · Accrington ST
  3. 19' Donald Love · yellow card · Accrington ST
  4. 21' Harry Waldock · yellow card · Gillingham
  5. 28' Josh Woods · goal · assist Stefan Mols · Accrington ST
  6. 31' Devon matthews (own goal) · Gillingham
  7. 33' Armani Little · yellow card · Gillingham
  8. 66' Josh Woods · goal · assist Stefan Mols · Accrington ST
  9. 79' Ronan Chapman Hale · yellow card · Gillingham

Match stats

Match statsAccrington STGillingham
Possession %5644
Expected goals (xG)1.460.54
Shots216
Shots on target70
Corners111
Yellow cards23
Red cards00
Fouls815
Offsides10
Goalkeeper saves04

What the market said before kick-off

  • Accrington ST win 41% happened
  • Draw 28% did not happen
  • Gillingham win 30% did not happen
  • Over 2.5 goals 46% happened
  • Both teams score 53% happened

Pinnacle closing price with the margin removed, next to what happened. It is the market's view, not a tip: an outcome priced at 30% happens about 3 times in 10.

Venue: The Crown Ground, Accrington

Next matches

Line-ups, events and match stats: API-Football.

Starting line-ups

Accrington ST 3-1-4-2

  1. 1 L. Moulden GK
  2. 17 D. Matthews DF
  3. 2 D. Love DF
  4. 22 J. Anderson DF
  5. 16 Aidan Borland MF
  6. 38 C. O'Brien MF
  7. 30 C. Warren MF
  8. 14 Stefan Mols MF
  9. 33 D. Tutonda MF
  10. 23 T. Walton FW
  11. 39 J. Woods FW

Bench: C. Grant, T. Moore, J. Rogerson, Oliver Smith, J. Smith, C. Brown

Coach: J. Doolan

Regular starters not in the XI

  • S. Conneely — not in the squad (started 4 of the last 5)

Gillingham 3-4-3

  1. 1 O. Wright GK
  2. 5 A. Smith DF
  3. 19 O. Beckles DF
  4. 26 L. Dobbs DF
  5. 22 N. Freeman MF
  6. 14 R. McKenzie MF
  7. 8 A. Little MF
  8. 16 J. Brophy MF
  9. 24 H. Waldock FW
  10. 11 L. Sillah FW
  11. 10 Ronan Hale FW

Bench: E. Coleman, B. Dack, J. Daley, T. Eaves, S. Kendall, R. Luthra, G. McCleary

Coach: G. Ainsworth

Not in the XI does not mean injured: it can be rotation, a suspension or a knock. We only compare with the team's last 5 line-ups.

Pinnacle, margin removed (home / draw / away): 43 / 26 / 31% when the line-ups came out, 41 / 28 / 30% at kick-off.

In the big leagues, line-up news is usually already in the price by the time it is official.

The most likely result is not the same as value: value is where a bookmaker pays more than the fair price, and the two can point to different outcomes.

Value opportunity before kick-off Strong value

1 Accrington ST @ 2.55
Bookmaker Unibet (NL)
Price observed
Flag recorded @ 2.55 (Unibet (NL)) · recorded live, before kick-off
Market 1X2 (match result)
Availability and exact price varied by country and over time.
Fair price 2.38
Unibet (NL) 2.55
Confidence: Medium
Value-bet result Won · 1 +1.55u

Market discrepancy: before kick-off, Accrington ST (1) was priced at 2.55 by a soft bookmaker, above the fair price of 2.38 — a +7% gap. An observation about the price, not an instruction to bet.

A single result where a bookmaker pays above the fair price — separate from the main prediction below.

Most likely result

1/2 Home or away 74%

When no single result is likely enough, our pick covers the two most probable outcomes (double chance).

1X2
Sharp, recorded44%26%30%
Other estimates
Our model43%28%29%

Sharp, recorded = Pinnacle when we logged the match (it can be days old). Our model = our own estimate, which on average predicts worse than the market.

Fair odds of the pick (as recorded) 1.35
Sharp odds recorded for this prediction (Pinnacle) 2.15 / 3.51 / 3.07
Market Gap +7%
Confidence Medium
Model agreement High

Confidence reflects only the sharp probability of the selection: high from 50%, medium from 40%, low below. It says how likely the result is, not how big the price gap is. Model agreement shows how close our own model is to the sharp market on this selection — when it is Low, the market and our model disagree, so treat the flag with more caution.

Prediction result Won · 1

Value lifecycle Settled

Detected ·
1 Accrington ST · soft 2.55 (Unibet (NL)) · fair 2.38 · edge +7%
Opening sharp
2.15
At close
2.41 · CLV +5.8%
Result
Won +1.55u 🔒 Recorded live before kick-off

“Detected” is the moment the flag was first shown on the site and written to our ledger (recorded live since 26 September 2026). For earlier matches the flag was reconstructed afterwards from the prices we had stored, and the time shown is when the rule would have fired: a backtest, not a live record. When the gap closes, we say so instead of pretending the value is still there.

Match context

The last 4 head-to-head meetings we tracked split 1–2–1 (Accrington ST wins – draws – Gillingham wins).

Accrington ST scored 0.8 and conceded 0.6 across their last 5 matches in our results database; Gillingham scored 1.8 and conceded 0.8 in 5.

Since opening around 2.15, the sharp market price on Accrington ST has drifted to 2.41 — the market has moved against this outcome.

These figures come from our own tracked results and odds snapshots for this fixture — not from a generic stats feed.

Why this price?

Accrington ST
D W D D L
avg 0.8 scored · 0.6 conceded (last 5)
Gillingham
W D L W W
avg 1.8 scored · 0.8 conceded (last 5)
Recent head-to-head
06 Apr 2026 Gillingham 2–0 Accrington ST
02 Aug 2025 Accrington ST 1–1 Gillingham
15 Mar 2025 Accrington ST 1–1 Gillingham
12 Oct 2024 Gillingham 1–2 Accrington ST

Recent form and head-to-head from our settled results — context behind the fair price. The price itself comes from the sharp market, not from these alone.

Public, timestamped record

Logged before kick-off
Prediction record
Pick 1/2 · Home or away
Odds recorded for the prediction 1.26
Closing odds 1.34
Prediction CLV -5.4%
Result Won
Value-bet record

Recorded when the site showed it, before kick-off. Its seal is in our public export once this match’s row is published, and in the next daily external snapshot (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter); for flags recorded on match day that snapshot comes after kick-off, so the pre-kick-off proof is our own timestamp.

Value selection 1 · Accrington ST
Odds when flagged 2.55
Fair odds 2.38
Closing odds 2.41
Value CLV +5.8%
Profit (units) +1.55
Result Won
Prediction hash — integrity fingerprint c530d0060fe1fcc7

This hash fingerprints the prediction as recorded: teams, kick-off time, our model probabilities, the Pinnacle prices recorded for it (at logging or, if there were none, the first quoted after logging and before kick-off, which can be written in after the match) and the log time. A later edit to any of them would change it (a rescheduled kick-off changes it too). It does not cover closing prices, the result or the value-bet record above; value flags recorded live have their own seal in the public record. Verify in the public record →

Every day a snapshot of the full public record is published to a public Git repository and timestamped with OpenTimestamps. Timestamped snapshots are never overwritten and the Git history shows any difference, so a later change to a past row is visible by comparing two snapshots. The corrections file lists the corrections we announced. Verify on the public log →

Since 20 June 2026 the public record is snapshotted daily (07:40 Bucharest time: 04:40 UTC in summer time, 05:40 UTC in winter) to an external log. A prediction is externally timestamped before kick-off only if it was in a snapshot taken before the match; predictions logged on match day, or whose Pinnacle price was added after logging, first appear there after kick-off. Value flags have been recorded live only since 26 September 2026; earlier value flags were reconstructed on that date.

Methodology

The fair price comes from the sharp market itself: we strip the margin from Pinnacle-style odds — the most accurate public predictor in existence — and use our calibrated Elo + form model as a cross-check and as the fallback where no sharp price exists. Value is flagged only where a softer bookmaker prices a selection above that fair price, never on long shots (implied probability under 30%), and never beyond a plausible band. Most of the time there is no value — and we say so.

Found this useful? Send it to a friend who bets.