AnalysisTips — independent audit
49/100 · C TipsAudit Trust Score — Insufficient evidence
AnalysisTips has been audited over 100 verified picks. Measured win rate: 76% (claimed: not stated). Flat-stakes ROI: shown from 100 priced picks (41 so far). Closing line value: +1.2%. No verdict yet: a closing price could be measured on 12 picks, and a verdict needs 30.
@analysistips_org · 18,800 subscribers
No verifiable pick since 23 Aug 2026
Claimed vs. measured
shown from 100 priced picks (41 so far)
measured on 12 of 236 picks
How the numbers narrow: 236 posts collected from the public channel → 100 unique picks we could settle against a real fixture → 12 with a verified closing price, which is the only subset on which CLV can be measured at all.
CLV by market, against the closing price with the margin removed: 1X2 +1.2% (n=12) · both teams to score +1.5% (n=6) · double chance +11.2% (n=9). The verdict uses 1X2 picks only.
Verdict: Too early: 12 of 30 A verdict needs 30 picks with a measurable closing price; 12 so far.
Audit badge — free to embed
This badge reads live from the audit on this page. The number changes when the record changes, which is what separates it from a marketing sticker. Anyone audited here may use it, on any channel, without asking us.
Audited picks
Latest 40 of 100 settled picks
| Date | Match | Pick | Result | Odds | CLV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC Porto — Arouca · Primeira Liga | 1 1X2 | Won | 1.64 | — | |
| Udinese — Como · Serie A | X2 double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Lens — Auxerre · Ligue 1 | 1X double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Fortuna Sittard — AZ Alkmaar · Eredivisie | X2 double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Rio Ave — FC Porto · Primeira Liga | 2 1X2 | Won | — | — | |
| Sevilla — Rayo Vallecano · La Liga | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Fortuna Sittard — Cambuur · Eredivisie | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| OH Leuven — Club Brugge KV · Jupiler Pro League | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Gençlerbirliği S.K. — Fenerbahçe · Süper Lig | X2 double chance | Lost | 1.25 | +9.4% | |
| Gençlerbirliği S.K. — Fenerbahçe · Süper Lig | 2 1X2 | Lost | — | — | |
| Excelsior — PSV Eindhoven · Eredivisie | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Utrecht — AZ Alkmaar · Eredivisie | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Willem II — NEC Nijmegen · Eredivisie | X2 double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Norwich — West Brom · Championship | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| HK Kopavogur — Vestri · 1. Deild | 1X double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Kalmar FF — Malmo FF · Allsvenskan | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Norrby IF — GIF Sundsvall · Superettan | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Orgryte IS — Djurgardens IF · Allsvenskan | X2 double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Super Nova — Grobiņa · Latvia Virsliga | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Mariehamn — Lahti · Veikkausliiga | X2 double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Spain — Argentina · World Cup | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Lost | — | — | |
| FF Jaro — Inter Turku · Veikkausliiga | X2 double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Halmstad — BK Hacken · Allsvenskan | X2 double chance | Won | — | — | |
| IF Elfsborg — Sirius · Allsvenskan | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Hammarby FF — Degerfors IF · Allsvenskan | 1 1X2 | Won | — | — | |
| France — England · World Cup | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| France — England · World Cup | 1 1X2 | Lost | — | — | |
| Viking — Sandefjord · Eliteserien | 1 1X2 | Won | — | — | |
| Molde — Brann · Eliteserien | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Lillestrom — KFUM Oslo · Eliteserien | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Kristiansund BK — Sarpsborg 08 FF · Eliteserien | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Lost | — | — | |
| Start — Rosenborg · Eliteserien | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| AC Oulu — Gnistan · Veikkausliiga | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| AIK Stockholm — Gais · Allsvenskan | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Ham-Kam — Tromso · Eliteserien | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Won | — | — | |
| Bodo/Glimt — Fredrikstad · Eliteserien | 1X double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Mjallby AIF — Vasteras SK FK · Allsvenskan | OVER 1.5 over/under goals | Lost | — | — | |
| IFK Goteborg — IF Brommapojkarna · Allsvenskan | 1X double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Ferencvarosi TC — Vojvodina · UEFA Europa League | 1X double chance | Won | — | — | |
| Ferencvarosi TC — Vojvodina · UEFA Europa League | 1 1X2 | Won | — | — |
TipsAudit Trust Score
The Trust Score (0–100) is computed only from what we can measure: closing line value on verified picks, the size and age of the verified sample, and the gap between advertised claims and measured reality. It is deliberately conservative — without enough verified picks, no record can score as credible, no matter how good it looks. Most tipsters score C (insufficient evidence) because most records simply cannot be verified. A high score requires hundreds of verified picks with positive CLV; an F requires measured contradiction between claims and reality, not just bad results.
How to read this audit
100 settled picks is a small sample — far too small to prove skill either way. Treat any percentage on this page as weather, not climate. Why sample size matters →
Average closing line value measured on the picks we verified: +1.2%. CLV compares the tipped price with the sharpest closing price — it is the one metric pick selection cannot fake. What CLV means →
Frequently asked
Is AnalysisTips legit?
We cannot say yet. AnalysisTips has 100 settled public picks in our audit; closing line value could be measured on 12 of them (+1.2%), which is too few for a verdict either way. Trust score 49/100 (C). Treat any advertised ROI as unverified until the measurable sample grows.
What is AnalysisTips's closing line value (CLV)?
AnalysisTips's average CLV is +1.2%, measured on 12 picks where we could compare the advertised price with Pinnacle's closing price on the same market. CLV above zero means the picks consistently beat the closing line; it is the only tipster metric that converges within a few hundred picks, unlike ROI.
How many of AnalysisTips's picks did TipsAudit actually verify?
We read 236 public picks from AnalysisTips's channel. 100 were matched to a fixture and settled on the official result; 44 were on sports or leagues outside our coverage (not counted as failures); the rest could not be verified. Only settled picks enter the win rate and ROI — a tipster's own record is never taken at face value.
How we audit
We read each tipster's publicly posted picks, log them with their timestamp before kick-off, link them to real fixtures and settle them on the final result. Win rate and ROI use the odds the tipster quoted. CLV compares the price they took to the sharp closing line — the metric most strongly linked to a real edge. We only count picks we can independently verify, and we publish the losses. We are not affiliated with any tipster.
Are you AnalysisTips and want to respond or correct the data? Get in touch: Contact.