Claimed vs. measured
not enough picks with a verified closing price
How the numbers narrow: 6 posts collected from the public channel → 1 unique picks we could settle against a real fixture → 0 with a verified closing price, which is the only subset on which CLV can be measured at all.
Verdict: Not enough data yet
Audit badge — free to embed
This badge reads live from the audit on this page. The number changes when the record changes, which is what separates it from a marketing sticker. Anyone audited here may use it, on any channel, without asking us.
Audited picks
| Date | Match | Pick | Odds | CLV | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breiðablik — ÍBV · Urvalsdeild | OVER OU25 | — | — | Lost |
TipsAudit Trust Score
The Trust Score (0–100) is computed only from what we can measure: closing line value on verified picks, the size and age of the verified sample, and the gap between advertised claims and measured reality. It is deliberately conservative — without enough verified picks, no record can score as credible, no matter how good it looks. Most tipsters score C (insufficient evidence) because most records simply cannot be verified. A high score requires hundreds of verified picks with positive CLV; an F requires measured contradiction between claims and reality, not just bad results.
How to read this audit
1 settled picks is a small sample — far too small to prove skill either way. Treat any percentage on this page as weather, not climate. Why sample size matters →
How we audit
We read each tipster's publicly posted picks, log them with their timestamp before kick-off, link them to real fixtures and settle them on the final result. Win rate and ROI use the odds the tipster quoted. CLV compares the price they took to the sharp closing line — the metric most strongly linked to a real edge. We only count picks we can independently verify, and we publish the losses. We are not affiliated with any tipster.
Are you Puskás Tippek and want to respond or correct the data? Get in touch: Contact.